Maybe I haven’t explained the actual point I was trying to make very well. The blog post didn’t have anything to do with anti-semitism, but that was my point. I was trying to highlight the hypocrisy some people display when they say that being opposed to feminism means you are against Women’s interests, while trying to claim, like in this case, that there is no correlation between opposing Neo-conservative interests and opposing Jewish ones. I want people like Caitlin to choose a side, as I feel she is not being consistent.

Either a conservative who opposes BLM, Feminism, or other progressive identity movements should be freed from the accusation that that means he is opposed to Black or Women’s issues, or, if people like Caitlin think it is still OK to accuse people who are opposed to group advocacy movements of being prejudiced, then she needs to acknowledge that her writing is attacking and undermining a political movement dedicated to fighting for Jewish interests. And that while she might be technically free from the charge of anti-semitism, it would not be factually incorrect to say she was opposed to Jewish interests. And being opposed to Jewish interests, power, and influence, while still claiming to not hold unfounded prejudice and hatred against Jew’s, is exactly the position white nationalists like Kevin MacDonald hold. If Kevin is considered a hater and a bigot, then I don’t see how Caitlin can really claim to be any different.